Clarifying the term "orphan"

The term orphan is one that is used to designate children who have lost one or both parents. Confusion from this usage is has led to misunderstanding of the needs of children who have been identitied as orphans. UNICEF has issued a statement that raises awareness of the confusion and calls for its clarification.
UNICEF and global partners define an orphan as a child who has lost one or both parents. By this definition there were over 132 million orphans in sub-Saharan Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Caribbean in 2005. This large figure represents not only children who have lost both parents, but also those who have lost a father but have a surviving mother or have lost their mother but have a surviving father.

Of the more than 132 million children classified as orphans, only 13 million have lost both parents. Evidence clearly shows that the vast majority of orphans are living with a surviving parent grandparent, or other family member. 95% of all orphans are over the age of 5.

This definition contrasts with concepts of orphan in many industrialized countries, where a child must have lost both parents to qualify as an orphan. UNICEF and numerous international organizations adopted the broader definition of orphan in the mid-1990s as the AIDS pandemic began leading to the death of millions of parents worldwide, leaving an ever increasing number of children growing up without one or more parents. So the terminology of a ‘single orphan’ – the loss of one parent – and a ‘double orphan’ – the loss of both parents – was born to convey this growing crisis.

However, this difference in terminology can have concrete implications for policies and programming for children. For example, UNICEF’s ‘orphan’ statistic might be interpreted to mean that globally there are 132 million children in need of a new family, shelter, or care. This misunderstanding may then lead to responses that focus on providing care for individual children rather than supporting the families and communities that care for orphans and are in need of support.

There is growing consensus on the need to revisit the use of the term ‘orphan’ and how it is applied to help overcome this confusion.
Many thanks to Ethica for sending out the link.


Clarifying the terminology is always a good idea. Many notions are left over from another era.

I also was interested to see your link to the truth and reconciliation commission in Korea.

I, who as you know have more than a passing interest in adoption, did not even realize that there were these issues with Korean adoption. since reading your post I have found some Korean first mother websites.

Thanks for posting the information.

Popular Posts